More Men Enter Fields Dominated by Women

CNBC.com | 21 May 2012

Wearing brick-red scrubs and chatting in Spanish, Miguel Alquicira settled a tiny girl into an adult-size dental chair and soothed her through a set of X-rays. Then he ushered the dentist, a woman, into the room and stayed on to serve as interpreter.

A male dental assistant, Mr. Alquicira is in the minority. But he is also part of a distinctive, if little noticed, shift in workplace gender patterns. Over the last decade, men have begun flocking to fields long the province of women.

Mr. Alquicira, 21, graduated from high school in a desolate job market, one in which the traditional opportunities, like construction and manufacturing, for young men without a college degree had dried up. After career counselors told him that medical fields were growing, he borrowed money for an eight-month training course. Since then, he has had no trouble finding jobs that pay $12 or $13 an hour.

He gave little thought to the fact that more than 90 percent of dental assistants and hygienists are women. But then, young men like Mr. Alquicira have come of age in a world of inverted expectations, where women far outpace men in earning degrees and tend to hold jobs that have turned out to be, by and large, more stable, more difficult to outsource, and more likely to grow.

“The way I look at it,” Mr. Alquicira explained, without a hint of awareness that he was turning the tables on a time-honored feminist creed, “is that anything, basically, that a woman can do, a guy can do.”

After years of economic pain, Americans remain an optimistic lot, though they define the American dream not in terms of mansions and luxury cars but as something more basic — a home, a college degree, financial security and enough left over for a few extras like dining out, according to a study by the Pew Center on the States’ Economic Mobility Project.

That financial security usually requires a steady full-time job with benefits, something that has become harder to find, particularly for men and for those without a college degree. While women continue to make inroads into prestigious, high-wage professions dominated by men, more men are reaching for the dream in female-dominated occupations that their fathers might never have considered.

The trend began well before the crash, and appears to be driven by a variety of factors, including financial concerns, quality-of-life issues and a gradual erosion of gender stereotypes. An analysis of census data by The New York Times shows that from 2000 to 2010, occupations that are more than 70 percent female accounted for almost a third of all job growth for men, double the share of the previous decade.

That does not mean that men are displacing women — those same occupations accounted for almost two-thirds of women’s job growth. But in Texas, for example, the number of men who are registered nurses nearly doubled in that time period, rising from just over 9 percent of nurses to almost 12 percent. Men make up 23 percent of Texas public schoolteachers, but almost 28 percent of first-year teachers.

The shift includes low-wage jobs as well. Nationally, two-thirds more men were bank tellers, almost twice as many were receptionists and two-thirds more were waiting tables in 2010 than a decade earlier.

Even more striking is the type of men who are making the shift. From 1970 to 1990, according to a study by Mary Gatta, the senior scholar at Wider Opportunities for Women, and Patricia A. Roos, a sociologist at Rutgers, men who took so-called pink-collar jobs tended to be foreign-born non-English speakers with low education levels — men who, in other words, had few choices.

Now, though, the trend has spread among men of nearly all races and ages, more than a third of whom have a college degree. In fact, the shift is most pronounced among young, white, college-educated men like Charles Reed, a sixth-grade math teacher at Patrick Henry Middle School in Houston.

Mr. Reed, 25, intended to go to law school after a two-year stint with Teach for America, but he fell in love with the job. Though he says the recession had little to do with his career choice, he believes the tough times that have limited the prospects for new law school graduates have also helped make his father, a lawyer, more accepting.

Still, Mr. Reed said of his father, “In his mind, I’m just biding time until I decide to jump into a better profession.”

To the extent that the shift to “women’s work” has been accelerated by recession, the change may reverse when the economy recovers. “Are boys today saying, ‘I want to grow up and be a nurse?’ ” asked Heather Boushey, senior economist at the Center for American Progress. “Or are they saying, ‘I want a job that’s stable and recession proof?’ ”

In interviews, however, about two dozen men played down the economic considerations, saying that the stigma associated with choosing such jobs had faded, and that the jobs were appealing not just because they offered stable employment, but because they were more satisfying.

“I.T. is just killing viruses and clearing paper jams all day,” said Scott Kearney, 43, who tried information technology and other fields before becoming a nurse in the pediatric intensive care unit at Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital in Houston.

Daniel Wilden, a 26-year-old Army veteran and nursing student at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, said he had gained respect for nursing when he saw a female medic use a Leatherman tool to save the life of his comrade. “She was a beast,” he said admiringly.

More than a few men said their new jobs had turned out to be far harder than they imagined.

But these men can expect success. Men earn more than women even in female-dominated jobs. And white men in particular who enter those fields easily move up to supervisory positions, a phenomenon known as the glass escalator — as opposed to the glass ceiling that women encounter in male-dominated professions, said Adia Harvey Wingfield, a sociologist at Georgia State University. More men in an occupation can also raise wages for everyone, though as yet men’s share of these jobs has not grown enough to have an overall effect on pay.

“Simply because higher-educated men are entering these jobs does not mean that it will result in equality in our workplaces,” said Ms. Gatta of Wider Opportunities for Women.

Still, economists have long tried to figure out how to encourage more integration in the work force. Now, it seems to be happening of its own accord.

“I hated my job every single day of my life,” said John Cook, 55, who got a modest inheritance that allowed him to leave the company where he earned $150,000 a year as a database consultant and enter nursing school.

His starting salary will be about a third what he once earned, but database consulting does not typically earn hugs like the one Mr. Cook recently received from a girl after he took care of her premature baby sister. “It’s like, people get paid for doing this kind of stuff?” Mr. Cook said, choking up as he recounted the episode.

Several men cited the same reasons for seeking out pink-collar work that have drawn women to such careers: less stress and more time at home. At John G. Osborne Elementary, Adrian Ortiz, 42, joked that he was one of the few Mexicans who made more in his native country, where he was a hard-working lawyer, than he did in the United States as a kindergarten teacher in a bilingual classroom. “Now,” he said, “my priorities are family, 100 percent.”

Betsey Stevenson, a labor economist at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, said she was not surprised that changing gender roles at home, where studies show men are shouldering more of the domestic burden and spending more time parenting, are now showing up in career choices.

“We tend to study these patterns of what’s going on in the family and what’s going on in the workplace as separate, but they’re very much intertwined,” she said. “So as attitudes in the family change, attitudes toward the workplace have changed.”

In a classroom at Houston Community College, Dexter Rodriguez, 35, said his job in tech support had not been threatened by the tough economy. Nonetheless, he said, his family downsized the house, traded the new cars for used ones and began to live off savings, all so Mr. Rodriguez could train for a career he regarded as more exciting.

“I put myself into the recession,” he said, “because I wanted to go to nursing school.”

Do men use their power to oppress women?

Feminists say men have the power and use it to oppress women. If that’s true, how did they get the brazen idea they could crank up a women’s movement and prevail against this male power and halt its supposed objective of keeping women underfoot?

by Jerry A. Boggs

Men have the power, and they use it to oppress women.

So say many ideological feminists.

But if that’s true, how did feminists get the brazen idea that they could crank up a women’s movement and prevail against this male power and halt its supposed objective of keeping women underfoot? In other words, how could a powerless group ever expect to triumph over a powerful group and subvert its alleged goal of oppression? I mean, physically powerless me would never take on the very powerful boxer Mike Tyson no matter how much he oppressed me. And if I thought I could somehow defeat him with a brains-over-brawn strategy, wouldn’t that mean I believed that I, not he, had the power in the first place?

Perhaps feminists realized they could succeed with a women’s movement because all along they knew something they dared not admit, even among themselves: Men’s true intent regarding women was not oppression but protection, and that the “oppression” occurred only when the protection over-reached to deny women the equal opportunity to participate in realms men thought were unfit for women.

But denying women equal opportunity was not men’s intent, either; rather, it was the result of men’s perception of women as the weak and delicate moral gatekeepers who were not to be debased or harmed by society’s often brutal reality.

Thus, women were to be placed on a pedestal where they would be protected from the often ruthless, ugly business of generating income except when necessary. And even when it was necessary for women to generate income, they generally were permitted to work only in physically safe and untaxing work. For example, until recent times men taught in schools in the winter, and the women taught in the summer when men worked the farms, a hard, grueling work that men protected women from doing. Women were to be protected from all the things both sexes thought women were above and not to be exposed to.

That males desire to protect females, rather than oppress them, is perhaps best symbolized by the ship Titanic, which sank in 1912 when society stood perhaps at the pinnacle of patriarchal oppressiveness. Even wealthy men aboard the Titanic refused to enter the lifeboats ahead of even poor, third-class women. By allowing adult females into the boats, the men knew they were dooming many children — in some cases their own — in order to save women they did not even know. If men had wanted to oppress women, the Maritime law would have been “Men and children first,” and the Titanic’s casualties would have been mostly females, not mostly males. 

And perhaps feminists knew something else: if men were willing to sacrifice their lives for women, maybe they would sacrifice their arguments against a women’s movement that protested men’s protections and demanded women’s equal opportunities. In retrospect, they knew right.

What feminists knew, I suspect, is that the average guy — who represents about 97 percent of the male population — has no more power than the average female and often has less when women’s power in the reproductive world is factored in. The power dynamic between the sexes is such that the average man puts up a facade of power and the average women puts up a facade of powerlessness. (In the Myth of Male Power, Warren Farrell posited that men’s weakness is their facade of strength and women’s strength is their facade of weakness.) Feminists encourage women to put up that facade, for they believe society and government are far more inclined to give to the powerless than to the powerful.

All this is likely what inspired feminists to launch a movement that was calculated to succeed on the basis of the “powerless female.” The women’s movement succeeded so well, in fact — because feminists knew men so well — that in time feminists were able to transform their equality movement into a sexist anti-male movement, which still encountered little or no resistance from men, especially among male journalists in the mainstream media.

So do men use their power to oppress women?

Posted in Male "Power" and "Privilege" | Tagged female power, male power, The Myth of Male Power, Warren Farrell | Leave a comment